Back to projects

Decision support

Council

Five distinct advisors run in parallel, peer-review anonymized reasoning, and feed a concise chairman's verdict with an expandable transcript.

Focus

Structured decision review

FlaskParallel agentsDecision systems
Interactive rendition · sample data

The challenge

Messy decisions often benefit from opposing frames, but group dynamics can blur whether a conclusion reflects independent reasoning.

The approach

Run distinct perspectives in parallel, anonymize their arguments, and produce a synthesis that preserves disagreement and blind spots.

  • 01

    Five advisor roles with independent prompts

  • 02

    Anonymized peer review

  • 03

    Chairman synthesis and action recommendation

  • 04

    Expandable report transcript

Next

Explore richer decision inputs while keeping the report scannable.

Discuss this project